Assigment Explain the “Naturalistic View” in Epistemology in an essay of roughly
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Explain the “Naturalistic View” in Epistemology in an essay of roughly 4 paragraphs. Remember to cite all sources, including Lectures and the Textbook, as part of good scholarship.
What concerns does the Naturalistic View raise for the Standard View?
What is Quine arguing for in “Epistemology Naturalized”?
Does Feldman think the Natural View undermines the Standard View?
What arguments does Feldman offer for his view?
In your judgement, can the standard view be successfully defended from the naturalistic view? Is one view preferable to you?
Is the Standard View incompatible with naturalism? What do you think?
What impact should scientific studies of the mind have on epistemology, in your view? How might they be relevant? How might they be irrelevant?
Justify and give reasons for your views!
In a brief essay of 2 paragraphs, explore the relationship between the sciences and epistemology by answering ONE of the TWO following questions, either (a) or (b). Remember to cite all sources, including Lectures and the Textbook, as part of good scholarship.
(a) Explain the relationship between a priori claims about the geometry of physical space and actual physics. How did Carnap respond to discoveries in physics and the a priori? How does BonJour respond to these arguments about the a priori and physics? What relationship do you think philosophy should have to the natural sciences, like physics?
(b) Explain the relationship between contemporary discoveries in psychology and the traditional belief in human rationality. In what ways does psychology cast doubt on human rationality? What challenges are there to the claim that humans are rational? How does Feldman think the Standard View should respond? How do you think we should interpret the experiments Feldman discusses?