In an essay of at least 4 paragraphs, respond to ONE AND ONLY ONE of the followi
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
In an essay of at least 4 paragraphs, respond to ONE AND ONLY ONE of the following prompts, either OPTION A or OPTION B. Indicate clearly which option you are responding to. Remember to cite all sources, including Lectures and the Textbook, as part of good scholarship. Be sure to respond to each question under the prompt.
OPTION A: THE STANDARD VIEW
What do we know on the “Standard View”? Why does Feldman consider this the “Standard View”
What is the problem of Skepticism for the Standard view?
What do you think is the best argument in favor of Skepticism?
What do you think is the worst argument in favor of Skepticism?
What do you think is the best argument against Skepticism?
What do you think is the worst argument against Skepticism?
(Optional) if you studied naturalism, how do you think naturalism differs from skepticism? Do you think naturalism is more or less a threat to the standard view, and why?
In the last paragraph:
Do you think the skeptical view is correct? Why or why not? If so, how would you reply to Feldman’s defense of the Standard View? If not, how would you defend the Standard view against skepticism?
OPTION B: THE ANALYSIS OF KNOWLEDGE
On your view, what is the appropriate analysis of knowledge? (You need not describe an existing view – just give me your sincere judgement at this point in the course.) Why do you think it is appropriate? Is it anything like the traditional account? Does it add or subtract something from the traditional account?
How would your analysis respond to the Gettier problem? (Be sure to briefly explain the Gettier problem so it’s clear you understand how your analysis would respond to it).
Now, evaluate the alternative analyses of knowledge we studied in this class, including both the 2 forms of evidentialism and the 4 forms of non-evidentialism we discussed, and say a bit about why your analysis is better!