Module 1 Assignment: Compare and Connect Stress, Coping and Intra- & Interperson
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Module 1 Assignment: Compare and Connect Stress, Coping and Intra- & Interpersonal Factors and Health Across Health Conditions
To conclude Module 1, you will build a document in which you compare and connect the module topics across health conditions and with healthy individuals. Below are suggested formats for this Assignment. Creativity and thoughtful effort is encouraged. This type of Assignment helps with integration of learning and will help you develop a deeper and broader understanding of the topics of the weeks, your specific assigned health condition, as well as of the other major health conditions that affect the U.S. population.
Re-read the Week 2 and Week 3 Discussion contributions posted by you and your group members.
Note similarities and differences in what you and others found for the factors studied both weeks in this module. Why are there differences? Why are there similarities? Are they explained by the characteristics of each health condition? What other factors may have played a role? Draw conclusions from what you’ve read on the boards, and also include your own thoughts on what may explain your conclusions.
Organize your findings by factors (stress, coping, personality, etc.). Use subtitles to help you stay focused and help your Instructor grade effectively.
Compare and connect is a higher-order critical thinking skill. Review the Learning Resource, titled “Writing a Paper: Comparing and Contrasting,” before you begin your Assignment.
By Day 7
At the end of the module (Week 3), write a brief, focused paper, or create a well-organized table in which you:
Compare and contrast your findings for your assigned health condition with that of others in your team, based on your collective findings in the group Discussions.
Draw conclusions regarding reasons for similarities and differences among the health conditions.
Cite and reference your assigned readings for the class so far, as well as the readings you located to support your statements.
You can prepare this Assignment in essay format (with subtitles for each factor you are comparing) or in table format. Either way, include a cover page (no abstract) and try to stay within 2–3 pages in length of text, plus cover and reference pages. You are welcome to create your own graphs and figures if these facilitate your understanding and ability to organize the material.
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 3.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “MD1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
Click the Module 1 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Click the Module 1 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “MD1Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
To access your rubric:
Module 1 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Module 1 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
My name is Alzahraa Hassona. My assigned health disease is Heart disease and I will send you my posts from last week and this week and my classmates posts to compare and contras for the assignment.
THIS IS MY POST:
2 days agoAlzahraa Hassona RE: Group B
Explain the bivariate (one-on-one) and multivariate (combined) relationships between heart disease and personality, resilience/grit, and religion/spirituality.
Recent extensive research shows that socio-behavioral factors are related to the prevalence of heart disease. Regarding personality, it has revealed that Type-A behavior pattern among individuals is a high predictor of heart disease. Other factors such as resilience and religion/spirituality, however, are not causally related to the prevalence of the disease but are important in helping the patients to cope with its effects. The impact of heart disease on social relationships
Research reveals that involvement in social relationships is fundamental to health (Koenig, 2015). An individual with heart disease will often strain physically, emotionally, and financially, which may affect their involvement in social relationships. Given that these connections to others can give meaning and purpose to life, such individuals are encouraged to maintain these relationships whenever possible to help in dealing with the impacts of the illness.
The impact of social support on heart disease
Social support is essential in helping individuals to adjust to illnesses, given that it benefits both mental and physical health (Taylor, 2011). Regarding heart disease, social support has indirect effects through enhanced mental health, by fostering a sense of meaning and purpose in life as well as reducing the impact of stress for a patient (Schwartz, Michael & Rapkin, 2017). Also, it may trigger physiological sequelae such as reduced heart rate and blood pressure, among others. Using the PERMA Theory of Well-Being to understand and integrate all we learned this week
According to the theory, five blocks are important in enhancing well-being. It recognizes that human beings do not only want to survive but aim at thriving. Hence, they are more concerned about achieving higher levels of well-being given its myriad benefits in the real world. In this regard, we can appreciate human beings are unique and exhibit qualities that may increase or limit their well-being (Friedman & Kern, 2014). However, in efforts to limit an individual’s stress and increase their well-being, one can embark on embracing the tenets of the theory as it has been associated with a plethora of benefits. They include having stronger immune systems, reduction in cardiovascular mortality, and having overall better physical health, among others.
Each of the week’s variables/factors fit within the theory in these ways.
This factor fits in that an individual may derive meaning from belonging and serving in various societal institutions such as those of worship.
Social support fits in that support and connection with others is one of the best remedies to the challenges in life, such as health or financial challenges, among others.
Personality fits in that the theory recognizes that different people will derive well-being from the identified block at varying degrees, given that they are unique and different.
Resilience/grit enhances greater self-control regarding emotions and reduces the possibility of engaging in risky behavior that may compromise one’s health.
Friedman, H. S., & Kern, M. L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 719–742. doi:10.1146/annual-psych-010213-115123
Koenig, H. G. (2015). Religion, spirituality, and health: A review and update. Advances in Mind-Body Medicine, 29(3), 19–26.
Schwartz, C. E., Michael, W., & Rapkin, B. D. (2017). Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: Mediators of the physical and emotional quality of life in a heterogeneous rare-disease cohort. Quality of Life Research, 26(11), 3075–3088. doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1633-2
Taylor, S. (2011). Social support: A review. In H. S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189–214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
These are my classmates posts:
3 days agoJESSICA PARSONS RE: Group B
Explain the bivariate (one-on-one) and multivariate (combined) relationships between your assigned health condition and personality, resilience/grit, and religion/spirituality. Is there extensive research on this?
Chronic back pain can significantly impact ones intrapersonal emotions. In a study regarding chronic diseases, conditions of the musculoskeletal and connective tissue systems were ranked with one of the largest range of disability; in which mental disorders, congenital malformations, and diseases of the nervous system were the only other conditions with similarly broad ranges (Schwartz, Michael, & Rapkin, 2017). When considering the varying degree of disability, the personal burden involved with the condition may have different implications for each individual suffering from it. Unlike many other conditions where the condition creates symptoms, such as pain, chronic back pain is the byproduct of an underlying disease or injury and not a stand-alone condition. As stated in last weeks discussion, chronic back pain is a very common condition that has a significant amount of literature regarding impact, coping methods, treatment options, and support. The multivariant relationship between an individual’s will to persevere despite pain, be resilient despite the odds, and connect with a healthy spiritual relationship can play a part in the limitations associated with chronic back pain. Personal reaction and the desire to not allow pain to take over one’s life are some of the factors that reduce the amount of disability that is associated with chronic pain. Individuals who are resilient and adaptive have shown to have less noticeable impairment as a result of chronic pain, then those who are unwilling to modify activities to accommodate the changes in their ability (Sturgeon & Zautra, 2010). For individuals who succumb to the limitations, rather than finding alternative ways to enjoy activities in a modified manner, evidence suggests that continued degeneration and stress inevitably increase chronic back pain symptoms. Additionally, stable emotional attachments to religious figures have shown to increase relation and reduce perceived pain (Hatefi, Tarjoman, & Borji, 2019). When religiously focused an individual can feel as if their devotion will impact pain levels, thus providing them with a way to feel in control of their own health and wellbeing. This control is a powerful tool in pain perception and reduces the limiting effect of chronic back pain.
What, if any, is the impact of your assigned health condition on social relationships?
While sometimes limiting and/or disabling, chronic back pain can affect an individual’s mood and behavior. The impact of long-term pain can increase major depression, alcohol use, and major anxiety disorder (Atkinson, Slater, Patterson, Grant, & Garfin, 1991). With alcohol abuse, depression, and anxiety there may be a propensity to self-isolate or avoid social interaction. When individuals feel as if their pain is unable to be managed, they may become more irritable and less likely to want to engage in social activities. Psychological adaptation to chronic pain is a major factor in the impact of social relationships. What is the impact of social support on your assigned health condition?
Social support can have an anti-stress effect, in which the support may have a buffering effect that allows the individual to cope with their stress more effectively by contributing to physical health and survival (Taylor, 2011). Chronic back pain may cause periods of disability in which social support can be an invaluable tool. Social support may provide mental and physical assistance in a more personal manner than that of a paid assistance or medical care. The informal transaction that occurs with social support, allows for individuals to open up about the intensity of pain and the limitations, without having to push themselves to the
How can you use the PERMA Theory of Well-Being to understand and integrate all you learned this week? How do each of the week’s variables/factors fit within the theory?
The PERMA theory of well-being integrates positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning, and accomplishment for whole-health benefits (University of Pennsylvania, 2019). This theory can be applied to chronic back pain as it is an excellent thought process to increase resilience and encourage individuals to seek out relationships that will benefit their wellbeing. As stress maintenance, socialization, and positive mindsets can improve pain symptoms, this theory encourages appropriate initiatives to achieving a better health outcome.
Be sure to include references and examples from the articles you found.
Atkinson, J.H., Slater, M.A., Patterson, T.L., Grant, I., & Garfin, S.R. (1991). Prevalence, onset, and risk of psychiatric disorders in men with chronic low back pain: A controlled study. Pain, 45(2), 111-121.
Hatefi, M., Tarjoman, A., & Borji, M. (2019). Do religious coping and attachment to God affect perceived pain? Study of the elderly with chronic back pain in Iran. Journal of Religion and Health, 58, 465-475.
Schwartz, C.E., Michael, W., & Rapkin, B.D. (2017). Resilience to health challenges is related to different ways of thinking: Mediators of physical and emotional quality of life in heterogeneous rare-disease cohort. Quality of Life Research, 26(11), 3075-3088. Doi:10.1007/s11136-017-1633-2
Sturgeon, J.A. & Zautra, A.J. (2010). Resilience: A new paradigm for adaptation to chronic pain. Current Pain and Headache Reports, 14, 105-112.
Taylor, S. (2011). Social support: A review. In H.S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology (pp. 189-214). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
University of Pennsylvania. (2019). Authentic happiness: Positive psychology theory. Retrieved from https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/learn
2 days agoAmy Van Styn RE: Group B Van Styn
Week 3 Discussion Board: Inter- and Intrapersonal Factors and Health
Relationships Between Asthma, Personality, Resilience/Grit, and Religion/Spirituality
With respect to the relationship between personality traits and asthma, there exists a significant amount of research that supports this relationship. For simplicity, I will address two more recent articles addressing this topic. In a 2020 study conducted by Najjab et al., the researchers examined the relationship between the Five Factor Model (FFM) personality traits and the lifetime risk of an asthma diagnosis. The five personality factors consist of agreeableness (cooperative, friendliness), conscientiousness (methodical, organized), extraversion (energetic, assertive), neuroticism (negative affect), and openness (learns new skills and experiences). According to Najjab et al. (2020), research has demonstrated a clear link between asthma severity and neuroticism, as neuroticism increases the likelihood of ineffective coping and lack of treatment adherence. Additionally, low conscientiousness (or impulsivity) results in poorer outcomes for asthma patients, as this can also result in lack of treatment adherence and the likelihood of poor health behaviors such as smoking, poor diet, and increased body mass index (BMI). Furthermore, personality traits influence the way individuals respond to stress. The majority of asthmatics are triggered by irritants, allergens, or other environmental agents that result in an inflammatory response in the lungs. Additional stress also promotes an inflammatory response. Therefore, asthmatics experiencing stress and cope ineffectively will have more severe and lengthier asthma exacerbations (Najjab et al., 2020). Najjab et al. (2020) found that in addition to optimism, extraversion, and openness, conscientiousness was a significant predictor of asthma-related outcomes, including mortality. Individuals that exhibit conscientiousness are more likely to engage in a healthy lifestyle, make better choices, and adhere to treatment. The conscientious individual is also more likely to demonstrate better coping, decreased levels of stress, and avoidance of impulsive negative behaviors. The correlation between conscientiousness and positive health outcomes is also supported by Friedman and Kern (2014). The researchers outlined that individuals who are more conscientious will be more cooperative and receptive to treatment, thus a decreased mortality risk and better health outcomes. One additional study with respect to asthma and personality outlined the relationship between the type D personality, symptom control, and quality of life in asthmatic patients. The type D personality is defined as a more negative affect (decreased optimism) and inhibitive in expression or interaction (lack of extraversion or openness). As a result, those with a type D personality exhibit increased incidence of depression, anxiety, and vulnerability to stressors (Kim et al., 2015). Kim et al. (2015), thus, found that asthmatic individuals that demonstrate the type D personality traits have a decreased quality of life and worse health outcomes. In the realms of resilience/grit and religion/spirituality related to asthma, there is less existing research. With respect to resilience, Tully et al. (2019) conducted a study of African-American asthmatic children and parents, measuring parent mood and resilience and the effects on the child’s health. The researchers demonstrated that parent resilience and mood had a moderate positive effect on the outcomes for the asthmatic child. However, more research is needed in this area of research (Tully et al., 2019). The Tully et al. (2019) study was the most recent study, with more studies dating to the early 2000s. Finally, with respect to religion and spirituality, Harris et al. (2019) addressed issues related to asthma treatment disparities in the African-American community and the potential for a health and faith partnership. For many reasons, including history of exploitation, lack of cultural competency, and continuing discrimination, the African-American population tends to mistrust the medical establishments (and rightfully so). Thus, this mistrust leads to disparities in access to treatment. Therefore, Harris et al. (2019) created a faith and health partnership entitled “Not One More Life” (NOML), which consisted of volunteer health care providers. The goal of NOML was to decrease medical disparities, provide culturally competent medical care, and reduce mistrust amongst the African-American community (Harris et al. 2019). Again, more research is needed in this research area. Social Relationships and Social Support
Asthma has a significant impact on the social relationships of the individual. According to Rodriguez et al. (2020), children with asthma have increased absences from school and are less likely to participate in sports or other physical activities, thus disrupting the opportunity to create social relationships. This could also be true of adults, especially those that are poorly controlled. Adults may be less likely to interact socially for fear of encountering a triggering irritants or events. Thus, asthma can have a devastating effect on social relationships. According to Taylor (2011), social support can occur in various forms. The first is informational support, which consists of the healthcare team and helping the patient to understand their disease condition. Secondly, there is instrumental support, which could come from social workers or case managers locating community services and assistance. Finally, the emotional support stems from family, friends, and therapists that ensure a nurturing, reassuring environment for the individual (Taylor, 2011). Each of these means of social support can have a significant impact on the success of an individual in the navigation through a stressful event of disease process. Whereas, the lack of social support can contribute to negative outcomes for the individual. PERMA Theory of Well-Being
Finally, I will briefly address the PERMA Theory of Well-Being related to concepts of asthma. The PERMA Theory of Well-Being consists of five concepts, which are positive emotions, engagement, positive relationships, meaning, and accomplishment (University of Pennsylvania, 2019). As outlined in the aforementioned paragraphs, the concepts of positive emotion (optimism), engagement, and social relationships all have a significant impact on the health outcomes for an asthmatic individual. Meaning, or purpose in life, stems from the thought that there is something beyond or larger than ourselves. In relation to asthma, perhaps this would manifest by looking beyond one’s own illness and educating others on asthma and coping mechanisms, a “wounded healer” or servant leader per se. Finally, it seems that all of the elements together, including successful coping, optimism, positive social relationships, all lead to a sense of accomplishment and increased satisfaction with life. References
Friedman, H.S., & Kern, M.L. (2014). Personality, well-being, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 719-742. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115123
Harris, D., Graham, L., & Teague, W. G. (2019). Not One More Life: A health and faith partnership engaging at-risk African Americans with asthma in Atlanta. Annals of the American Thoracic Society, 16(4), 421–425. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201803-166IP
Kim, S. R., Kim, H. K., Kang, J. H., Jeong, S. H., Kim, H. Y., Kim, S. R., & Kim, M. Y. (2015). Does type D personality affect symptom control and quality of life in asthma patients. Journal of Clinical Nursing), 24(5–6), 739–748. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1111/jocn.12667
Najjab, A., Palka, J. M., & Brown, E. S. (2020). Personality traits and risk of lifetime asthma diagnosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 131. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.109961
Rodríguez, E. M., Gulbas, L. E., Horner, S. D., Alba-Suarez, J., George-Jones, J., Davidson, S., Lehning, E., Esperanza, C., & Alvarado, C. (2020). Stress and coping in pediatric asthma: The experiences of low-SES Latinx families. Clinical Practice in Pediatric Psychology, 8(2), 126–138. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/cpp0000287.supp Taylor, S. (2011). Social support: A review. In H.S. Friedman (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of health psychology(pp. 189-214). Oxford University Press. Tully, C., Rose, M., Breen, S., Herrera, N., Shelef, D. Q., Streisand, R., & Teach, S. J. (2019). Relationship between parent mood and resilience and child health outcomes in pediatric asthma. Families, Systems, & Health, 37(2), 167–172. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.1037/fsh0000417
University of Pennsylvania. (2019). Authentic happiness: Positive psychology theory. https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/learn/wellbeing
2 days agoDorothy Hiralien RE: Group B
1. As I looked through research to see how studies have identified positive or negative relationships between diabetes and personality, one particular study that stood out to me was a study that looked into different personality traits and its relationship with diabetes. They specifically focused on Type A personality. In its finding, the results were, “Patients with auto-immune T1D (Type 1 Diabetes) have higher Type A scores than T2D (Type 2 Diabetes) patients. Furthermore, patients with auto-immune thyroid disease also have elevated Type A scores similar to those observed in type 1diabetes, suggesting that an elevated Type A score in T1D is potentially related to its auto-immune origin” (A Rouland, J-C Chauvet-Gelinier, A-L Sberna, E Crevisy, P Buffier, T Mouillot, J-M Petit, & B Vergès., 2020). It may be helpful to note that, Type A personality is described as impatience, strong career ambition and competitiveness within this particular article (A Rouland, J-C Chauvet-Gelinier, A-L Sberna, E Crevisy, P Buffier, T Mouillot, J-M Petit, & B Vergès., 2020). In addition, the data also hinted at a possible connection between Type A personality and other auto-immune diseases
“via stress-triggering psychobiological pathways” (A Rouland, J-C Chauvet-Gelinier, A-L Sberna, E Crevisy, P Buffier, T Mouillot, J-M Petit, & B Vergès., 2020). Lastly, it stated, “The different personality score between T1D and T2D is an important factor, which could influence self-care coping strategies in diabetes and long-term prognosis” (A Rouland, J-C Chauvet-Gelinier, A-L Sberna, E Crevisy, P Buffier, T Mouillot, J-M Petit, & B Vergès., 2020). This ties in to week 2’s discussion in regards to stress, coping skills and how it has an impact on how one handles their diagnosis. It is interesting to see that depending on the personality type, it can suggest whether or not one will be able to develop management skills to improve quality of life. In another study, it looked into qualities of personality and its relationship with diabetes and how it can negatively influence or positively influence their diagnoses. Its findings were that in providing care to diabetics, it is best when providers are able to provide care that aligns with their personality rather than using a “one size fits all” Lotte Skøt, Jesper Bo Nielsen, & Anja Leppin. (2018). It could be easier to provide medical knowledge to patients that is tailored to their needs as it will help patient’s ability to manage the disease. In addition, it stated, “There is some evidence that suggests personality traits may be directly and/or indirectly related to health risk perception” Lotte Skøt, Jesper Bo Nielsen, & Anja Leppin. (2018). In looking at relationships between diabetes and resilience, studies have shown that individuals that are diagnosed with diabetes develop resilience overtime as they will need to adapt to their new lifestyle. One study found that patients are able to increase their abilities to have fewer complications when they are satisfied with their healthcare services, and their overall health based on a resilience model used in their study (Hilliard, M. E., Iturralde, E., Weissberg-Benchell, J., & Hood, K. K., 2017). Patients’ ability to remain resilient is influenced by the care they receive as it will help keep patients stay committed to one health provider as they will build stronger relationships. It was said, “several studies reported that resilient individuals had better diabetes control, higher levels of positivity, and lower levels of depression (Choi, S. A., & Hastings, J. F., 2019).
In regards to religion/ spirituality, I was interested in the African community as religion is a huge part of their community and many African Americans suffer from the disease. It stated, “African Americans are disproportionately affected by diabetes, when compared to other racial groups and hold lower adherence to Type 2 diabetes self-management recommendations especially when low socioeconomic status is taken into account” (Choi, S. A., & Hastings, J. F., 2019). Studies show that “Spirituality and spiritual practices also have been found to positively influence Type 2 diabetes management, follow-up care, general health, and overall well-being, as well as indicate a positive association with improved health outcomes”(Choi, S. A., & Hastings, J. F., 2019). As a result, religion is often used as a pillar to get through adversity in the African American community, as well as getting support from others. “Study participants viewed religion and spirituality as an important component of life. Half of the participants in Cho, Hastings study (n = 21) reported that religion and spirituality played a significant role in their lives. Four participants described religion/spirituality as a life priority (Choi, S. A., & Hastings, J. F., 2019). Ultimately, religion/spirituality has a positive influence on patients with diabetes. 2. A study done by Hempler, Joensen and Willaing found that “significant associations were found between diabetes types and social networks, social support and health behavior. People with type 2 diabetes were less physically active, less likely to follow recommended diet (men), had few contacts with family and friends, than people with type 1 diabetes” (Nana F. Hempler, Lene E. Joensen, & Ingrid Willaing., 2016). I found it interesting that there was a difference between the two types of diabetes. As I continued to look for further research, I see the importance of social relationships is crucial, not only when dealing with diabetes. It was mentioned, “Reducing possible type 2 diabetes risk through communication and positive daily interactions” (Maki, K. G., 2018) is part of the implications of the patient’s ability to manage diagnosis. 3. Social support is important in life, and when dealing with a life long illness, it will be a great help if others are on board to help along the way. In any case, it is no surprise research showed a positive relationship between social support and diabetes. The positive relationship indicated that if patients with diabetes are getting support from family and friends, they are able to adapt more quickly, and be able to manage the disease with fewer symptoms of anxiety and depression. A specific study looked into older adults and their account on the impact of social support in their lives and the results were that social support meant food preparations, daily activities, attention, guidance, financial support was a pleasure to have. It helped ease stress of having to rearrange their whole life to include a healthy diet, medication management and more. Ultimately, social support goes a long way and it can look differently for many people. Nobody wants to go through a tough time alone. 4. PERMA theory is divided into five elements that can go hand in hand with the research I read on my topic. This theory can be integrated into what was learned this week because PERMA’s five elements all touch upon the positive experience one can have despite having a lifelong illness. Developing overall well-being is greatly associated with the levels of interactions/social support, finding meaning and purpose, and cultivating meaning relationships. It stated, “In well-being theory, these twenty-four strengths underpin all five elements, not just engagement: deploying your highest strengths leads to more positive emotion, to more meaning, to more accomplishment, and to better relationships” (University of Pennsylvania, 2019). This theory helps focus the lens on touching base on different areas in one’s life, which is imperative in order to be well as a whole and helps find purpose in all life moments not just one specific moment. References
A Rouland, J-C Chauvet-Gelinier, A-L Sberna, E Crevisy, P Buffier, T Mouillot, J-M Petit, & B Vergès. (2020). Personality types in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Endocrine Connections, 9(3), 254–260. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-19-0499
Lotte Skøt, Jesper Bo Nielsen, & Anja Leppin. (2018). Who perceives a higher personal risk of developing type 2 diabetes? A cross-sectional study on associations between personality traits, health-related behaviours and perceptions of susceptibility among university students in Denmark. BMC Public Health, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5884-9
Hilliard, M. E., Iturralde, E., Weissberg-Benchell, J., & Hood, K. K. (20171001). The Diabetes Strengths and Resilience Measure for Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes (DSTAR-Teen): Validation of a New, Brief Self-Report Measure. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 42(9), 995–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsx086
Choi, S. A., & Hastings, J. F. (2019). Religion, spirituality, coping, and resilience among African Americans with diabetes. Journal of Religion & Spirituality in Social Work: Social Thought, 38(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/15426432.2018.1524735
Nana F. Hempler, Lene E. Joensen, & Ingrid Willaing. (2016). Relationship between social network, social support and health behaviour in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: cross-sectional studies. BMC Public Health, 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2819-1
Maki, K. G. (2018). The Relationship Between Social Support and Type 2 Diabetes Risk. Communication Research Reports, 35(1), 12–21.
Kristianingrum, N. D., Wiarsih, W., & Nursasi, A. Y. (2018). Perceived family support among older persons in diabetes mellitus self-management. BMC Geriatrics, 18(Suppl 1), 304. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-018-0981-2
University of Pennsylvania. (2019). Authentic Happiness: Positive Psychology Theory. Retrieved from https://www.authentichappiness.sas.upenn.edu/learn/wellbeing
2 days agoTamara Thomas Original Post- No health Condition
No Heath Condition Topic
Supplemental Articles Explain the bivariate (one-on-one) and multivariate (combined) relationships between your assigned health condition and personality, resilience/grit, and religion/spirituality. Is there extensive research on this?
When a person has no ailments or inflicted illnesses, their relationships within spirituality, religion, and overcoming encounters will be subjugated to their environmental experiences and culture. The lack of disease or sickness that a person may experience may be detrimental to the person not having a definitive reason to have a relationship with these outside forces if that is not apart of their culture. Some religions contribute their sincere faith to their overall health and wellbeing due to having a strong spiritual relationship and routine. Şenel, E., & Demir, E. (2018). Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis of the Articles Published in the Journal of Religion and Health Between 1975 and 2016. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(4), 1473–1482.
What, if any, is the impact of your assigned health condition on social relationships?
Social relationships with a person that does not have a health condition should not be impeded on the individual, but there may be implications if the other part of the relationship the person is experiencing an illness. Other mitigating factors would not contribute to an illness but increased stress and overall hardships that the individual would need to overcome. Reza ALI Mohseni, Sajjad Moeinfar, Ali Moeinfar, & Raheleh Saei. (2018). Social factors affecting women’s social health in Uremia: Case Study on Married Women 25-45 Years. Savād-i Salāmat, 3(1), 30–38.
What is the impact of social support on your assigned health condition?
Coping skills are vital to a person’s overall wellbeing. Coping skills are essential regardless if someone has a health condition or not. Mental health is just as important as physical health. Kanekar, A., & Sharma, M. (2020). COVID-19 and Mental Well-Being: Guidance on the Application of Behavioral and Positive Well-Being Strategies. Healthcare (2227-9032), 8(3), 336.
How can you use the PERMA Theory of Well-Being to understand and integrate all you learned this week? How do each of the week’s variables/factors fit within the theory?
The five building blocks are categorized as Positive Emotion, Engagement, Relationships, Meaning, and Accomplishment of the PERMA theory. Embodying this theory in an overall positive and uplifting mindset, there will be a more established foundation of positive thought process if their situation changes in the future. Aldana Sol Grinhauz. (, 2015). The study of the character strengths in children: Relations with the psychological well-being, social desirability, and personality. Psicodebate, 15(1), 43–68.
Aldana Sol Grinhauz. (2015). The study of the character strengths in children: Relations with the psychological well-being, social desirability and personality. Psicodebate, 15(1), 43–68.
Kanekar, A., & Sharma, M. (2020). COVID-19 and Mental Well-Being: Guidance on the Application of Behavioral and Positive Well-Being Strategies. Healthcare (2227-9032), 8(3), 336.
Reza ALI Mohseni, Sajjad Moeinfar, Ali Moeinfar, & Raheleh Saei. (2018). Social factors affecting women’s social health in Uremia: Case Study on Married Women 25-45 Years. Savād-i Salāmat, 3(1), 30–38.
Şenel, E., & Demir, E. (2018). Bibliometric and Scientometric Analysis of the Articles Published in the Journal of Religion and Health Between 1975 and 2016. Journal of Religion and Health, 57(4), 1473–1482