Analyze and critique Brian Knudsen’s research. Then propose a better way it coul
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Analyze and critique Brian Knudsen’s research. Then propose a better way it could be done.
Question to Answer:
-What did they count?
-Why did they count it (e.g., what’s the big issue in the world and what’s the gap in the scholarly literature)?
-How did they count it (e.g., independent, dependent, and control variables)?
-What is at stake in counting it at all and in counting it in the way they did?
-What did they hypothesize would result from counting things in this way?
-What did in fact result (i.e., were their hypotheses verified or falsified)?
-What are the insights that can be drawn from counting these things in this way?
-What are the limitations of counting these things in this way?
-Were they addressed and/or how might they be addressed? What are future directions for future counting projects?
– How might resources from critical theory and/or ethnography deepen their project as it stands? -How might critical theory and/or ethnography projects precede or follow their project?
Don’t forget to add at least FIVE literature reviews!
Primary Assessment Criteria: 1) Conceptual understanding and 2) Critical evaluation