skip to Main Content

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Improving Community Health No unread replies.No replies. U

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Improving Community Health
No unread replies.No replies.
Unit 2 Discussion 2: Due Friday by 11:59 pm CT
Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Improving Community Health
This assessment addresses the following learning objective(s):
• Analyze how policies influence the structure and financing of health care, practice, and health outcomes.
Instructions
It’s easy to discuss the way things “should be” regarding access to affordable, quality healthcare. But what actions can be taken to enact actual change? For this discussion, you will assume a role of leadership, power, and influence within your community. In this role, you have the ability to propose a program or service that can improve the health of your community. Considering your role, respond to the following question: (Side Note of me and my community: Just want to make you aware that I am a African-American female living in New Orleans, LA)
Propose one measure that will improve the health of your community, addressing health disparities and socioeconomic factors.
• Provide a brief summary detailing the need for this measure (this may include a little background on your community/demographics).
• Briefly explain how you will enact and support the measure.
• Summarize any push-back you expect to receive (and from whom).
• Detail what is needed to approve or enact this measure (ex: city council approval, city budget approval, mayoral endorsement, state funding, grants, etc.)
Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.
Rubric and Readings below:
Rubric
HA610 Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Improving Community Health
HA610 Unit 2 Discussion 2 – Improving Community Health
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Analysis
HA610-CO1 6 pts
Level 5
Post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion and the analysis includes breadth and depth, is aligned to the unit topic, relates to the course content, and personal analysis is supported by well-aligned references and examples. 5 pts
Level 4
Post addresses all of the required prompt elements in the discussion – does not demonstrate a full understanding of course content and unit topic. The analysis of the topic is justified, and personal analysis is supported by references and/or examples. 4.5 pts
Level 3
Post is missing important elements, demonstrates limited understanding of topic and/or course concepts, offers limited validation of personal position. There is evidence of some supporting evidence, there is a reference to the research literature, text, course materials, or field-related examples. There is a basic analysis of the topic and personal analysis is supported by well-aligned examples. 4 pts
Level 2
Post and responses are missing important elements related to the discussion and demonstrate a lack of understanding of the topic and lacks validation of position, and/or there is no use of supporting items of evidence. There is minimal evidence of analysis of the topic and/or personal analysis is not supported by well-aligned examples or references. 3.5 pts
Level 1
Post does not address discussion questions, and/or does not demonstrate an understanding of the topic and/or lacks validation of position with no use of supporting items of evidence. There is no evidence of analysis. 0 pts
Level 0
Post was not submitted, or there is no relationship between the post and the discussion prompt.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCollaboration
PRICE-E 6 pts
Level 5
Collaborates with fellow learners at the required level relating the discussion to relevant course concepts and extending the conversation by asking open-ended questions to move the conversation forward, and answers questions asked on the post by instructor and peers. 5 pts
Level 4
Collaborates with fellow learners at a comprehensive level and relates the content to relevant course concepts but does not extend the conversation by asking open-ended questions. There are responses evident to questions asked by instructor or peers. 4.5 pts
Level 3
Collaborates with fellow learners but does not respond at a comprehensive level, and/or does not extend the conversation by asking or answering questions, and/or makes little connection to course content. 4 pts
Level 2
Does not collaborate with fellow learners regarding peers’ posts and/or makes no connection to course content and/or does not respond to peer and instructor responses, or the number of responses did not meet the requirement. 3.5 pts
Level 1
Does not collaborate with fellow learners and instructor. 0 pts
Level 0
Post was not submitted.
6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting 5 pts
Level 5
Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized demonstrating excellence in scholarly writing. Mechanics (spelling and punctuation) and grammar are excellent. 4.5 pts
Level 4
Posts in this discussion are well written and well organized scholarly material but have 1-2 different minor errors in mechanics and/or grammar. 4 pts
Level 3
Posts in this discussion are basic examples of scholarly material but have 3 different errors in mechanics and/or grammar. 3.5 pts
Level 2
Posts in this discussion are not clear and/or lack organization and/or have 4 or more different errors in mechanics and/or grammar. 3 pts
Level 1
Posts in this discussion lack evidence of clear organized scholarly writing. 0 pts
Level 0
Post was not submitted.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
PRICE-I 3 pts
Level 5
Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style. 2.5 pts
Level 4
Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in-text citations of sources and references but have 1-2 minor APA errors. 2 pts
Level 3
Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in-text citations of sources and references but have 3-4 minor APA errors. 1.5 pts
Level 2
Posts in this discussion demonstrate appropriate in-text citations of sources and references but have more than 4 APA errors. 1 pts
Level 1
Posts in this discussion do not provide either in-text citations or reference sources and/or have 4 or more APA errors. 0 pts
Level 0
Post was not submitted.
3 pts
Total Points: 20
ponses are valued at 20 points. Please review post and response expectations. Please review the rubric to ensure that your response meets criteria.
Estimated time to complete: 2 Hours
Unit 2 Topic 2 – Access, Affordability, and Accountability
Introduction
The topics of access to care, affordability of care, and accountability of healthcare organizations to effectively deliver care may seem like old adages for healthcare professionals. To reduce the risk of these becoming mundane topics, it is important that they be examined in the context of action: what can be done to improve access, affordability, and accountability?
Read: Aging well in rural America-the role and status of healthcare (Links to an external site.) (MacKinney, 2019)
Allow the bullet points below to guide your purpose for reading.
• Clinical care is only one component of the overall healthcare of an individual.
• This article highlights the importance of policy-making to support social determinates of health, specific to the rural population in America.
Read: Enabling services improve access to care, preventive services, and satisfaction among health center patients (Links to an external site.) (Yue, 2019)
Allow the bullet points below to guide your purpose for reading.
• Healthcare administrators frequently address the issue of improving access to care for members of their community. Often, the topic of transportation is part of this discussion. Do you think healthcare organizations should play a role in providing enabling services, such as transportation, for patients?
• Consider how State and local entities could craft policies to support enabling services, as a means of improving access to care.
Read: Oregon’s Coordinated Care Organizations and Their Effect on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid Enrollees (Links to an external site.) (Oakley, 2017)
Allow the bullet points below to guide your purpose for reading.
• Policy and politics aside, it is widely accepted that all healthcare organizations desire to provide high-quality care, at an affordable price, to the greatest number of patients. In the context of health policy, organizations can approach this goal through the coordinated care model.
• This research explains how the state of Oregon implemented an innovative Medicaid coordinated care model. As a result of this implementation, patient outcomes were significantly improved.
Summary
Rural America is often classified as vulnerable in terms of the patient population, but great potential exists for healthcare leaders to advance the health and quality of life for rural Americans. Through local and state level policies, improved health and wellness outcomes can be achieved. Additionally, healthcare teams can leverage their care coordination efforts to target a specific patient population and improve the way those patients seek and utilize health services. While formal policies may not be the driver for these measures, beneficial outcomes may propel future legislation to support continued improvement.
Estimated time to complete: 60 minutes
Reference(s)
MacKinney, A. C., Dudley, D., & Schoephoerster, G. (2019). Aging well in rural America-the role and status of healthcare. Generations, 43(2), 46-54. https://prx-herzing.lirn.net/login ***
Yue, D., Pourat, N., Chen, X., Lu, C., Zhou, W., Daniel, M., . . . Ponce, N. A. (2019). Enabling services improve access to care, preventive services, and satisfaction among health center patients. Health Affairs, 38(9), 1468-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05228
Oakley, L., Harvey, S., Yoon, J., & Luck, J. (2017). Oregon’s Coordinated Care Organizations and Their Effect on Prenatal Care Utilization Among Medicaid Enrollees. Maternal & Child Health Journal, 21(9), 1784–1789. https://prx-herzing.lirn.net/login ***

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Quality Papers

At eliteacademicessays.com, we always aim at 100% customer satisfaction. As such, we never compromise o the quality of our homework services. Elite academic helpers ensure that they craft each paper carefully to match the requirements of the instruction form.

Affordable Prices

Our company maintains a fair pricing system for all academic writing services to ensure affordability. Our pricing system generates quotations based on the properties of individual papers.

Professional Academic Writers

With eliteacademicessay.com, every student is guaranteed high-quality, professionally written papers. We ensure that we hire individuals with high academic qualifications who can maintain our quality policy. These writers undergo further training to sharpen their writing skills, making them more competent in writing academic papers.

Customer Support 24/7

Our customer support works around the clock to provide students with assistance or guidance at any time of the day. Students can always communicate with us through our live chat system or our email and receive instant responses. Feel free to contact us via the Chat window or support email: support@eliteacademicessays.com

.

100% Originality

Eliteacademicessays.com maintains a zero-plagiarism policy in all papers. As such, Elite academic essays professional academic writers ensure that they use the students’ instructions to deliver plagiarism-free papers. We are very keen on avoiding any chance of similarities with previous papers.

On-Time delivery

Elite Academic Essays guarantees all students of swift delivery of papers. We understand that time is an essential factor in the academic world. Therefore, we ensure that we deliver the paper on or before the agreed date to give students ample time for reviewing.

Our Homework Writing Disciplines

Get High-Quality Homework Writing Services
Back To Top