Students often equate the structural frame with red tape and bureaucracy and see
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
Students often equate the structural frame with red tape and bureaucracy and see the human resource frame as soft and simply concerned with how people feel. Sometimes the important understanding that participative (people-focused) structures are also possible outcomes of rational thinking and organizational design efforts, may get missed. Consider the ways in which the two frames are potentially complementary, not necessarily inconsistent or adversarial.
Provide an example from your own experience of how these frames can inform / complement one another and benefit from an ability to “see” both at work in the system. What does holding both frames reveal about the system or change effort that otherwise might be missed? Some of the chapter case studies can assist you in brainstorming an example
Please use this as the source: Bolman, L. and Deal, T. (2017). Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. 6th edition. Or 5th edition