It’s been remarked previously that Sima Qian’s history reads like a novel while
Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates
It’s been remarked previously that Sima Qian’s history reads like a novel while remaining a work of history, heavily characterized by action and fictitious speech that function as the motor of narrative development. We see this more pointedly in the chapter on Hsiao Yü and Kao Tsu. How is this way of remembering history different and/or more effective than merely describing the turns of events? Why is it important from the historical perspective? How do you see the subjectivity and objectivity intertwined in such description of characters?
No need for general introductions and plot summary! Please state clearly the arguments and support with evidence (please analyze quotes directly from the Book) No need for outside resources so please avoid using ideas from other scholars! Thank you!