skip to Main Content

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Instructions Informatics in the Clinical Setting Conduct an interview with someo

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Instructions
Informatics in the Clinical Setting
Conduct an interview with someone in an informatics role in a clinical setting. Then, in a Microsoft Word document of 5-6 pages formatted in APA style, discuss each of the following criteria:
Role description and education level required for the role.
Describe their views on how their role affects patient safety and improves the quality of patient care.
Describe the human factors faced in the role and other challenges.
Express insights gained from the interview.
Research and discuss the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting. Describe how these governing agencies influence delivery of direct patient care.
Research, discuss, and identify the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting. Be sure to get the perspective of your selected informatics professional during your interview.
On a separate references page, cite all sources using APA format. Helpful APA guides and resources are available in the South University Online Library. Below are guides that are located in the library and can be accessed and downloaded via the South University Online Citation Resources: APA Style page. The American Psychological Association website also provides detailed guidance on formatting, citations, and references at APA Style.
• APA Citation Helper
• APA Citations Quick Sheet
• APA-Style Formatting Guidelines for a Written Essay
• Basic Essay Template
Please note that the title and reference pages should not be included in the total page count of your paper.
Submission Details:
Submission Details:
Name your document SU_NSG3039_W4_Project_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.
Submit your response in a 5-6 pages paper to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (10-11)
11 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (11-13)
13 points
Proficient (B Range) (13-14)
14 points
Exemplary (A Range) (14-16)
16 points
Criterion Score
Described interviewee’s role and education level required for the role
Student did not submit assignment
Did not describe interviewee’s role and education level required for the role.
Described interviewee’s role and education level required for the role, but there is a lack of detail.
Described interviewee’s role and education level required for the role. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Thoroughly described interviewee’s role and education level required for the role.
/ 16
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (14-17)
17 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (17-19)
19 points
Proficient (B Range) (19-21)
21 points
Exemplary (A Range) (22-24)
24 points
Criterion Score
Described interviewee’s views on how his or her role impacts patient safety and improves the quality of patient care
Student did not submit assignment
Did not describe interviewee’s views on how his or her role impacts patient safety and improves the quality of patient care, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Described interviewee’s views on how his or her role impacts patient safety and improves the quality of patient care, but there is a lack of detail.
Described interviewee’s views on how his or her role impacts patient safety and improves the quality of patient care. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Described interviewee’s views on how his or her role impacts patient safety and improves the quality of patient care. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 24
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (14-17)
17 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (17-19)
19 points
Proficient (B Range) (19-21)
21 points
Exemplary (A Range) (22-24)
24 points
Criterion Score
Described the human factors faced in the interviewee’s role and other challenges
Student did not submit assignment
Did not describe the human factors faced in the interviewee’s role and other challenges, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Described the human factors faced in the interviewee’s role and other challenges, but there is a lack of detail.
Described the human factors faced in the interviewee’s role and other challenges. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Described the human factors faced in the interviewee’s role and other challenges. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 24
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (14-17)
17 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (17-19)
19 points
Proficient (B Range) (19-21)
21 points
Exemplary (A Range) (22-24)
24 points
Criterion Score
Expressed insights gained from the interview
Student did not submit assignment
Did not express insights gained from the interview, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Expressed insights gained from the interview, but there is a lack of detail.
Expressed insights gained from the interview. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Expressed insights gained from the interview. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 24
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19)
19 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22)
22 points
Proficient (B Range) (22-25)
25 points
Exemplary (A Range) (25-28)
28 points
Criterion Score
Researched and described the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting. Described how these governing agencies impact delivery of direct
Student did not submit assignment
Did not Research and described the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting and did not describe how these governing agencies impact delivery of direct patient care, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Researched and described the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting. Described how these governing agencies impact delivery of direct patient care, but there is a lack of detail.
Researched and described the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting. Described how these governing agencies impact delivery of direct patient care. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Researched and described the impact of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators and The Joint Commission Patient Safety Goals in your clinical setting. Described how these governing agencies impact delivery of direct patient care. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 28
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (17-19)
19 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (20-22)
22 points
Proficient (B Range) (22-25)
25 points
Exemplary (A Range) (25-28)
28 points
Criterion Score
Researched, identified and described the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting. Included the perspective of the interviewee.
Student did not submit assignment
Did not research, identify and describe the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting and did not Include the perspective of the interviewee, or the details are vague or nonexistent.
Researched, identified and described the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting. Included the perspective of the interviewee, but there is a lack of detail.
Researched, identified and described the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting. Included the perspective of the interviewee. Explanations were good but could be more detailed.
Researched, identified and described the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform (TIGER) utilized in your clinical setting. Included the perspective of the interviewee. Specific, detailed evidence is used to support ideas.
/ 28
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (7-8)
8 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (8-9)
9 points
Proficient (B Range) (10-11)
11 points
Exemplary (A Range) (11-12)
12 points
Criterion Score
Organization (introduction thesis transitions conclusion)
Student did not submit assignment
Introduction is limited or missing entirely.
The paper lacks a thesis statement.
Transitions are infrequent, illogical, or missing entirely. Conclusion is limited or missing entirely.
Introduction is present but incomplete or underdeveloped.
The paper is loosely organized around a thesis that may have to be inferred.
Transitions are sporadic.
Conclusion is present, but incomplete or underdeveloped.
Introduction has a clear opening, provides background information, and states the topic.
The paper is organized around an arguable, clearly stated thesis statement.
Conclusion summarizes main argument and has a clear ending.
Introduction catches the reader’s attention, provides compelling and appropriate background
info, and clearly states the topic.
The paper is well organized around an arguable, focused thesis.
Conclusion leaves the reader with a sense of closure and provides concluding insights.
/ 12
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (7-8)
8 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (8-9)
9 points
Proficient (B Range) (10-11)
11 points
Exemplary (A Range) (11-12)
12 points
Criterion Score
Usage and Mechanics (grammar, spelling, sentence structure)
Student did not submit assignment
Writing contains numerous errors in spelling, grammar,
and/or sentence structure that severely interferes with readability and comprehension.
Errors in spelling and grammar exist that somewhat interfere with readability and/or comprehension.
Writing follows conventions of spelling and grammar throughout. Errors are infrequent and do not interfere with readability or comprehension.
The paper is basically error free in terms of mechanics. Grammar and mechanics help establish a clear idea and aid the reader in following the writer’s logic.
/ 12
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.
Criteria   
No Submission
0 points
Emerging (F through D Range) (7-8)
8 points
Satisfactory (C Range) (8-9)
9 points
Proficient (B Range) (10-11)
11 points
Exemplary (A Range) (11-12)
12 points
Criterion Score
APA Elements (Attribution, Paraphrasing, Quotations)
Student did not submit assignment
No attempt at
APA format.
APA format is
attempted for paraphrase, quote, and cite, but errors are significant.
Using APA
format—accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited in many spots throughout when appropriate or called for. Errors present are somewhat minor.
Using APA
format—accurately paraphrased, quoted, and cited throughout the presentation when appropriate or called for. Only a few minor errors present.
/ 12
Rubric Total Score
Total
/ 180
Overall Score
Overall Score
No Submission
0 points minimum
Emerging (F through D Range)
124 points minimum
Satisfactory (C Range)
141 points minimum
Proficient (B Range)
160 points minimum
Exemplary (A Range)
180 points minimum

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Quality Papers

At eliteacademicessays.com, we always aim at 100% customer satisfaction. As such, we never compromise o the quality of our homework services. Elite academic helpers ensure that they craft each paper carefully to match the requirements of the instruction form.

Affordable Prices

Our company maintains a fair pricing system for all academic writing services to ensure affordability. Our pricing system generates quotations based on the properties of individual papers.

Professional Academic Writers

With eliteacademicessay.com, every student is guaranteed high-quality, professionally written papers. We ensure that we hire individuals with high academic qualifications who can maintain our quality policy. These writers undergo further training to sharpen their writing skills, making them more competent in writing academic papers.

Customer Support 24/7

Our customer support works around the clock to provide students with assistance or guidance at any time of the day. Students can always communicate with us through our live chat system or our email and receive instant responses. Feel free to contact us via the Chat window or support email: support@eliteacademicessays.com

.

100% Originality

Eliteacademicessays.com maintains a zero-plagiarism policy in all papers. As such, Elite academic essays professional academic writers ensure that they use the students’ instructions to deliver plagiarism-free papers. We are very keen on avoiding any chance of similarities with previous papers.

On-Time delivery

Elite Academic Essays guarantees all students of swift delivery of papers. We understand that time is an essential factor in the academic world. Therefore, we ensure that we deliver the paper on or before the agreed date to give students ample time for reviewing.

Our Homework Writing Disciplines

Get High-Quality Homework Writing Services
Back To Top